Identification and Treatment of Academic Misconduct

In order to strengthen the construction of academic ethics standards for scientific journals, promote scientific research integrity, protect the rights and interests of readers and authors, and maintain the quality and reputation of this journal, “Clean Coal Technology” will strictly test all submitted papers in accordance with the editorial publishing process. The specific testing and identification process and treatment methods are as follows:


First, the procedure for the identification of academic misconduct

This journal adopts CNKI 'Science and Technology Periodical Academic Misconduct Document Detection System' and related search engine system to detect the papers, and actively pays attention to the clues provided in the peer review, and compares the 'Chinese Academic Literature Network Publishing Library' with the full text. The database examines whether the paper has plagiarism and plagiarism, forgery, falsification, improper signature, and multiple scholarships in various aspects of editing and publishing. The editorial department will invite the experts or editorial committees of relevant research fields to examine and identify the papers with high check-up rate through systematic examination in a prudent manner.


Second, the scope of the paper to be tested

1) All submitted papers, ready to be hired and accepted papers;

2) Papers reported to be suspected of academic misconduct.


Third, the standard of identification of academic misconduct

The paper was checked and re-examined by CNKI “Science and Technology Journal Academic Misconduct Document Detection System”. If the check rate is 15% or more, the editorial department will submit the paper and the comparative paper to the reviewer or the editorial committee to confirm the nature and form of the paper, and make the identification and treatment of the paper and the comparison paper.


The criteria for identifying academic misconduct are as follows:

1) The content of the thesis is intact or the original results are copied intact;

2) In the content of the thesis, change the type of the results of others and treat the results of others as the results of their own independent completion; or do not change the type of results but use the copyrighted components of the results and change the specific manifestations of the results, and Treat the results of others as the results of their own independent completion;

3) Citing other people's protected opinions, plans, materials, data, etc., without specifying or listing the corresponding references;

4) Same as the main content of the paper that the author or others have published or published electronically on the Internet, only to make some formal changes, and the substantive research is insufficient;

5) Fabricating or tampering with research results, survey data, experimental data or literature materials in the paper;

6) Submit the same article to both the journal and other publications;

7) The author's signature and ranking, the author unit marked the existence of disputes.


Fourth, the treatment of academic papers identified as academic misconduct

1) This journal will treat the papers that are ultimately identified as academic misconduct in a prudent manner, notify the author in a timely manner, and allow the author to explain and defend the issue before making a decision.

2) If the paper has not been accepted, the editorial department will immediately terminate the processing process, make the rejection and give the author a critical education.

3) If the paper is in the process of being hired but not officially published, the editorial department will make the rejection and cancel the qualification of the applicant, and at the same time give the author an archive and warning.

4) If the paper has been officially published, the editorial department will officially revoke the announcement of the paper on the paper version, the website of the journal, and notify the cooperation database to delete the online version and terminate the dissemination of the paper; In this event, the author's unit is notified. The author is required to refund the manuscript fee for this paper, and publicly apologize to the journal, the infringer or the unit, and all readers for the infringement and adverse effects of the paper on the paper version, and assume corresponding responsibilities. The editorial department reserves the right to continue to recover compensation if it causes reputation or other losses to the journal.

5) The papers written by the authors of the papers with the plagiarism of plagiarism and plagiarism, which are the first author or the author of the communication, will not be accepted in the third year.


Fifth, the author's objection processing

If the author of the paper disagrees with the identification and processing results of this journal, he may submit a written application review to the journal within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the notice (the journal will not be accepted after the deadline), and the editorial department is responsible for inviting experts to the paper will be reviewed, the final processing opinion will be made, and the author of the review will be notified within 30 working days.

The above measures shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation and shall be interpreted by the editorial department of “Clean Coal Technology”.


Clean Coal Technology

上一篇:Retraction Regulations

下一篇:Peer Review System