HUANG Chunchao;LI Zhengqi;LU Yue;WANG Yufei;CHEN Zhichao;

• 1:School of Energy Science and Engineering
• 2:Harbin Institute of Technology
• 3:Zhengzhou Research Institute of Harbin Institute of Technology

Abstract：

The existing faulty coal-fired boiler has a minimum stable combustion load rate of 50%,making it challenging to meet deep peak shaving demands. Previous research has primarily focused on reducing NOx emissions rather than achieving stable combustion at low loads. Most experimental conditions are set at full load,thus lacking studies on low-load conditions. To address the insufficient deep peak shaving capability of faulty coal-fired boiler,a novel low-load stable combustion technology has been developed. This technology retains the original burner's secondary air structure. By incorporating central powder feeding,introducing swirling gap air,and optimizing the premixing section and flared outlet,it can achieve stable combustion at a minimum load rate of 30% solely through its own recirculation zone. This technology was applied to LNASB burners of a 350 MW faulty coal-fired boiler,resulting in a low-load stable combustion LNASB burner(SLNASB). Through laboratory gas-particle phase experiments,the effect of gap air mass flow on the gas-particle flow of SLNASB was analyzed at 30% boiler load. The experimental results showed that gap air could regulate the shape and size of recirculation zone. When the gap air mass flow was 66% of the inner secondary air mass flow,the recirculation zone formed a large ring with a length of1.0d and a diameter of 0.48d. The zone boundary was 0.075d from the central axis(where d is the outer second exit diameter). At 44%gap air flow, the recirculation zone became central, with a length of 0.7d and a diameter of 0.60d. At 22% and 0 gap air flow, the recirculation zone turned into a small ring,with lengths of 0.5d and diameters of 0.24d and 0.32d,respectively. The total recirculation ratio for 66%,44%,22% and 0 gap air flow were 0.74,0.55,0.29 and 0.38,respectively,with swirl numbers of 0.872,0.934,0.784 and 0.512,and gas/particle diffusion angles of 37.8°/36.3°,38.4°/36.6°,35.1°/32.0° and 36.0°/35.4°,respectively. In the radial range of r=0-50 mm,the axial velocity of 66% and 44% gap air flow was lower than that of 22% and 0. At 22% gap air flow,the tangential velocity decayed more rapidly. For the same x/d(where x is the distance from the measuring point to the outer),the radial velocity with no gap air was greater than with it,and the negative value range was smaller. After x/d=0.1,the turbulence intensity peak at 66% and 44% gap air flow was higher than the other two conditions. As the gap air flow decreased,the turbulence kinetic energy at the same position gradually increased. The turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rate at 0 gap air flow was lower than with it. Under different conditions,the particle concentration is higher near the burner center region and lower at the periphery. At 66% gap air flow,there was significant particle recirculation in the x/d=0.3-0.7 range,with the recirculation starting point close to the burner center. At 44% gap air flow,central region particle recirculation occurred in the x/d=0.5-0.7 range. At 0 gap air flow,the peak position was near r/d=0.15,with high concentration particles at the edge of primary air, and obvious particle recirculation in the x/d=0.1-0.3 range. At 22% gap air flow, there was no significant particle recirculation.

Key Words： low load stable combustion;gas-particle two phase;swirl burner;faulty coal;deep peak shaving

Abstract:

Keywords:

Foundation: 黑龙江省头雁行动计划

Authors: HUANG Chunchao;LI Zhengqi;LU Yue;WANG Yufei;CHEN Zhichao;

DOI: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.24062501

References：

• [1]HUBER M,WEISSBART C.On the optimal mix of wind and solar generation in the future Chinese power system[J].Energy,2015,90:235-243.
• [2]OLAUSON J,AYOB M N,BERGKVIST M,et al.Net load variability in Nordic countries with a highly or fully renewable power system[J].Nature Energy,2016,1:16175.
• [3]VITA V,ZAFIROPOULOS E,GONOS I F,et al.Power system studies in the clean energy era:From capacity to flexibility adequacy through research and innovation[M]:Flexitranstore.Cham:Springer International Publishing,2020:73-83.
• [4]国家能源局.全国煤电机组改造升级实施方案[EB/OL].(2021-10)[2024-06]https：//www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021.
• [5]BAI X F,DING H,LIAN J J,et al.Coal production in China:Past,present,and future projections[J].International Geology Review,2018,60(5/6):535-547.
• [6]KUROSE R,MAKINO H,SUZUKI A.Numerical analysis of pulverized coal combustion characteristics using advanced lowNOx burner[J].Fuel,2004,83(6):693-703.
• [7]宋民航，黄云，黄骞，等.旋流煤粉燃烧器低负荷稳燃技术探讨[J].中国电机工程学报，2021,41(13):4552-4566.SONG Minhang,HUANG Yun,HUANG Qian.et al.Discussion on low-load stable combustion technology of swirl pulverized-coal burner[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2021,41(13):4552-4566.
• [8]陈智超.中心给粉旋流燃烧器气固流动及应用的研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2007.
• [9]LI Z Q,JING J P,CHEN Z C,et al.Combustion characteristics and NOx Emissions of two kinds of swirl burners in a 300-MWeWall-fired pulverized-coal utility boiler[J].Combustion Science and Technology,2008,180(7):1370-1394.
• [10]张广才，周科，鲁芬，等.燃煤机组深度调峰技术探讨[J].热力发电，2017,46(9):17-23.ZHANG Guangcai,ZHOU Ke,LU Fen,et al.Discussions on deep peaking technology of coal-fired power plants[J].Thermal Power Generation,2017,46(9):17-23.
• [11]FAN W D,LIN Z C,LI Y Y,et al.Experimental flow field characteristics of OFA for large-angle counter flow of fuel-rich jet combustion technology[J].Applied Energy,2010,87(8):2737-2745.
• [12]YOU C F,ZHOU Y.Effect of operation parameters on the slagging near swirl coal burner throat[J].Energy&Fuels,2006,20(5):1855-1861.
• [13]LIU Y C,FAN W D,WU M Z.Experimental and numerical studies on the gas velocity deviation in a 600MWe tangentially fired boiler[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2017,110:553-563.
• [14]YUAN Z H,CHEN Z C,WU X L,et al.An innovative low-NOx combustion technology for industrial pulverized coal boiler:Gasparticle flow characteristics with different radial-air-staged levels[J].Energy,2022,260:125142.
• [15]CHEN Z C,YUAN Z H,WANG Y F,et al.Experimental study of gas-particle flow in the coal-fired industrial boiler applied radial air staging at variable over-fired air distributions[J].Fuel,2023,354:129315.
• [16]ZENG L Y,LI Z Q,ZHAO G B,et al.The influence of swirl burner structure on the gas/particle flow characteristics[J].Energy,2011,36(10):6184-6194.
• [17]CHEN Z C,LI Z Q,WANG F Q,et al.Gas/particle flow characteristics of a centrally fuel rich swirl coal combustion burner[J].Fuel,2008,87(10-11):2102-2110.
• [18]CHEN Z C,LI Z Q,JING J P,et al.Gas/particle flow characteristics of two swirl burners[J].Energy Conversion and Management,2009,50(5):1180-1191.
• [19]YAN R,CHEN Z C,ZHANG B,et al.Impact of radial air staging on gas-particle flow characteristics in an industrial pulverized coal boiler[J].Energy,2022,243:123123.
• [20]李争起，黄椿朝，王誉霏，等.一种回流区形态可调节的旋流煤粉燃烧器及其使用方法：202311319641.9[P].2024-01-09.
• [21]LIN Z C,FAN W D,LI Y Y,et al.Research of low NOx combustion with large-angle counter flow of a fuel-rich jet and its particledynamics anemometer (PDA) experiment[J].Energy&Fuels,2009,23(2):744-753.
• [22]FAN W D,LI Y Y,LIN Z C,et al.PDA research on a novel pulverized coal combustion technology for a large utility boiler[J].Energy,2010,35(5):2141-2148.
• [23]WANG Z Q,HU Y J,CHENG X X,et al.Influence of offset angle of mid-secondary air nozzles on gas-particle flow characteristics in a furnace[J].RSC Advances,2018,8(32):17764-17772.
• [24]WEBER R,VISSER B M,BOYSAN F.Assessment of turbulence modeling for engineering prediction of swirling vortices in the near burner zone[J].International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow,1990,11(3):225-235.
• [25]JING J P,LI Z Q,WANG L,et al.Influence of the mass flow rate of secondary air on the gas/particle flow characteristics in the near-burner region of a double swirl flow burner[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2011,66(12):2864-2871.
• [26]WANG G C,YANG F,WU K,et al.Estimation of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy:A review[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2021,229:116133.