ZHAO Yue;LI Xiaoshan;ZHANG Liqi;ZHAO Yongchun;

• 1:School of Energy and Power Engineering
• 2:Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Abstract：

Direct coupled combustion of biomass and coal for power generation has gained widespread attention as a key technology option for reducing carbon emissions in the coal power sector. Driven by Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals, the accurate quantification of greenhouse gas(GHG) emissions from biomass-coupled power production processes can effectively improve the accuracy and consistency of carbon emission data in the power generation industry and ensure the development of the domestic carbon trading market in a more fair and stable direction. Carbon accounting methods for biomass-coupled coal generating units at home and abroad were first introduced. Then the biomass direct-coupled generating unit greenhouse gas accounting boundary, calculation method and the selection principle of accounting parameters were proposed with reference to the experience of European and American countries. The results show that, compared with the current accounting method, the GHG accounting method based on biomass directly coupled with coal power generation has some differences in the accounting boundary, accounting scope and calculation method. For the accounting boundary, it is necessary to add N_2O emissions from the fuel combustion process and indirect carbon emissions from new equipment resources. The common biomass fuels were evaluated to see if zero emissions could be considered, and common biomasses was found, such as straw, municipal solid waste, and forest residues, met the GHG emission reduction requirements within the optimal economic transportation radius of the biomass in each province, and zero emissions within the reasonable transportation range(48 km) could be considered. In the calculation method, fuel consumption was recommended to select the measurement method according to the carbon emission stratification, the carbon oxidation rate could be directly selected as the default value of 99% in the case of small-ratio blending, carbon emission brought by the desulfurization link calculation is recommended, and the N_2O accounting was needed for the circulating fluidized bed combustion temperature under the working condition of 1 123 K.

Key Words： biomass;direct coupling;thermal power industry;accounting method;GHG;carbon emission

Abstract:

Keywords:

Foundation: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2021YFF0601003)

Authors: ZHAO Yue;LI Xiaoshan;ZHANG Liqi;ZHAO Yongchun;

DOI: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.LC24012903

References：

• [1] 黄少中，袁家海.以火电低碳转型支撑保供降碳双重目标[J].中国电力企业管理，2022(34):52-55.HUANG Shaozhong,YUAN Jiahai.Supporting the dual goals of supply protection and carbon reduction with low-carbon transformation of thermal power[J].China Power Enterprise Management,2022(34):52-55.
• [2] 郑丁乾，田善君，马思宁，等.基于空间分析方法的我国燃煤耦合生物质发电潜力分析[J].洁净煤技术，2022,28(6):35-43.ZHENG Dingqian,TIAN Shanjun,MA Sining,et al.Potential analysis of coal-biomass co-firing power generation in China based on a spatial analysis method[J].Clean Coal Technology,2022,28(6):35-43.
• [3] MOLCAN P,LU G,LEBRIS T,et al.Characterisation of biomass and coal co-firing on a 3 MWth combustion test facility using flame imaging and gas/ash sampling techniques[J].Fuel,2009,88(12):2328-2334.
• [4] AGBOR E,ZHANG X,KUMAR A.A review of biomass co-firing in North America[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2014,40:930-943.
• [5] The Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme.Biomass for heat and power[R].The International Renewable Energy Agency,2015:1-28.
• [6] 韩伟哲.燃煤锅炉耦合生物质(气)燃烧特性及污染物排放[D].保定：华北水利水电大学，2023.
• [7] 盖志杰，王鹏辉.燃煤电厂碳排放典型计算及分析[J].中国电力，2017,50(5):178-184.GAI Zhijie,WANG Penghui.A Typical calculation and analysis of carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants[J].Electric Power,2017,50(5):178-184.
• [8] MOHN J,SZIDAT S,FELLNER J,et al.Determination of biogenic and fossil CO2 emitted by waste incineration based on 14CO2 and mass balances[J].Bioresource Technology,2008,99(14):6471-6479.
• [9] SUN P,HUI S E,GAO Z X,et al.Experimental investigation on the combustion and heat transfer characteristics of wide size biomass co-firing in 0.2 MW circulating fluidized bed[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2013,52:284-292.
• [10] LIU D C,MI T,SHEN B X,et al.Reducing N2O emission by co-combustion of coal and biomass[J].Energy & Fuels,2002,16(2):525-526.
• [11] XIE J J,YANG X M,ZHANG L,et al.Emissions of SO2,NO and N2O in a circulating fluidized bed combustor during co-firing coal and biomass[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2007,19(1):109-116.
• [12] EUROPEAN COMMISSION.MRR Guidance document No.3:Biomass issues in the EU ETS[EB/OL].(2022-10-17) [2023-12-15].https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/gd3_biomass_issues_en.pdf.
• [13] EUROPEAN COMMISSION.MRR Guidance document No.1:The Monitoring and Reporting Regulation-General guidance for installations[EB/OL].(2023-02-20) [2023-12-15].https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-03/gd1_guidance_installations_en.pdf.
• [14] 中华人民共和国生态环境部.《企业温室气体排放核算方法与报告指南发电设施(2022年修订版)》[EB/OL].(2022-03-15) [2023-12-15].http://www.szguanjia.cn/article/2755.
• [15] 李佳仑，苑翔.北方地区生物质颗粒燃料全生命周期碳排放评价[J].山西建筑，2023,49(15):22-24,38.LI Jialun,YUAN Xiang.Assessment of carbon emissions from biomass particulate fuel throughout its lifecycle in the northern regin[J].Shanxi Architecture,2023,49(15):22-24,38.
• [16] 何珍，吴创之，阴秀丽.秸秆生物质发电系统的碳循环分析[J].太阳能学报，2008(6):705-710.HE Zhen,WU Chuangzhi,YIN Xiuli.Carbon cycle analysis of straw biomass power generation system[J].Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2008(6):705-710.
• [17] 边潇，宫徽，阎中，等.餐厨垃圾不同“收集-处理”模式的碳排放估算对比[J].环境工程学报，2019,13(2):449-456.BIAN Xiao,GONG Hui,YAN Zhong,et al.Comparison of carbon emission estimation among different "collection-disposal" mo-des for food waste[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2019,13(2):449-456.
• [18] 付凤英，徐拥军，夏金雨，等.垃圾分类下苏州市生活垃圾处理碳排放分析[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2023,46(3):133-140.FU Fengying,XU Yongjun,XIA Jinyu,et al.Carbon emissions analysis of municipal solid waste treatment in suzhou after waste classification[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2023,46(3):133-140.
• [19] 张炳康，李云玉，张欣，等.垃圾焚烧发电项目碳排放核算与减排效应研究[J].环境保护科学，2023,49(1):75-81.ZHANG Bingkang,LI Yunyu,ZHANG Xin,et al.Carbon emission calculation and reduction effects of municipal solid waste incineration power generation project[J].Environmental Protection Science,2023,49(1):75-81.
• [20] 周媛.基于采伐剩余物的生物质固体燃料利用评价[D].福州：福建农林大学，2016.
• [21] 蔡青旺.生物质利用对燃煤电厂CO2和大气污染物协同减排的影响研究[D].北京：华北电力大学(北京),2023.
• [22] WANG X B,TAN H Z,NIU Y Q,et al.Experimental investigation on biomass co-firing in a 300 MW pulverized coal-fired utility furnace in China[J].Proceedings of the Combustion Institute,2011,33(2):2725-2733.
• [23] 谭厚章，杨富鑫，阮仁晖，等.掺烧生物质对660 MW燃煤机组锅炉影响研究[J].热力发电，2022,51(4):23-29.TAN Houzhang,YANG Fuxin,RUAN Renhui,et al.Study on influence of biomass co-firing on a 660 MW pulverized coalfired boiler[J].Thermal Power Generation,2022,51(4):23-29.
• [24] 龙芸.燃煤电厂CO2排放计算模型与方法研究[D].重庆：重庆大学，2017.
• [25] 王一坤，邓磊，贾兆鹏，等.燃煤机组大比例直接耦合生物质发电对机组影响研究[J].热力发电，2021,50(12):80-91.WANG Yikun,DENG Lei,JIA Zhaopeng,et al.Influence of large-scale direct coupled biomass power generation on coal-fired units[J].Thermal Power Generation,2021,50(12):80-91.
• [26] 张泽琳，李鸿菲，王蕾等.考虑低碳的再制造工艺方案选择方法[J/OL].计算机集成制造系统：1-16[2024-01-23].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20230801.1446.004.html.
• [27] 温纪新.供需多重视角下中国制造业碳排放驱动机理与减排路径研究[D].徐州：中国矿业大学，2023.
• [28] 廖子昱.循环流化床锅炉N2O生成与控制研究[D].杭州：浙江大学，2011.
• [29] GLARBORG P.Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired syst-ems[J].Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,2003,29(2):89-113.
• [30] ARMESTO L,BOERRIGTER H,BAHILLO A,et al.N2O emissions from fluidised bed combustion.The effect of fuel characteristics and operating conditions[J].Fuel,2003,82(15/17):1845-1850.