周钢,宋涛,马士伟,沈来宏,葛晖骏
ZHOU Gang,SONG Tao,MA Shiwei,SHEN Laihong,GE Huijun

• 1:南京师范大学能源与机械工程学院
• 2:东南大学能源与环境学院能源转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室

摘要(Abstract)：

为从碳视角下研究市政污泥的最优处理工艺，通过生命周期评价方法，分别对市政污泥与一般工业固废、烟煤、稻秸混燃发电工艺的生命进程进行环境影响、资源消耗分析及碳排放核算。将3种污泥混燃工艺分为生产上游、生产过程和生产下游3个阶段，充分考虑全球性、区域性及局地性3个视角下各环境影响类型权重。计算结果表明，每处理1 t湿污泥(含水率65%),3种混燃工艺在全球性视角下总环境影响值最大，分别为0.87、0.12、0.09人·a/t;生产上游、生产过程(发电阶段)是导致环境恶化的2个主要阶段；全球变暖、酸化以及固体废弃物是对总环境影响贡献程度较大的3种环境影响类型；3种混燃工艺净碳排放量分别为6 522、742、410 kg (以CO_2计)。在资源消耗方面，污泥与一般工业固废混燃发电工艺的资源消耗潜值最大，其次为污泥与烟煤混燃发电工艺，污泥与稻秸混燃发电工艺最小。综合来看，污泥与稻秸混燃发电工艺是最环保且节约资源的污泥处置工艺，值得大力推广。
In order to study the optimal treatment process of municipal sludge from the perspective of carbon, the environmental impact, resource consumption analysis and carbon emission accounting of the life process of municipal sludge and general solid waste, bituminous coal and rice straw mixed combustion power generation process through Life Cycle Assessment method were analyzed. The three sludge mixed combustion processes were divided into three stages: upstream production, production process and downstream production, and the weights of each environmental impact type were fully considered from the three perspectives of global, regional and local. The calculation results show that the total environmental impact values of the three mixed combustion processes are the largest under the global perspective, which are 0.87,0.12 and 0.09 person·a/t for every 1 t wet sludge treated(moisture content of 65%). Production upstream and production process(power generation stage) are the two main stages leading to environmental degradation. Global warming, acidification and solid waste are the three types of environmental impact that contribute greatly to the total environmental impact. The net carbon emissions of the three mixed combustion processes are 6 522, 742 and 410 kg CO_2,respectively.In terms of resource consumption, the resource consumption potential of sludge and general industrial solid waste mixed combustion power generation process is the largest, followed by sludge and bituminous coal mixed combustion power generation process, and sludge and rice straw mixed combustion power generation process is the smallest. On the whole, the sludge and rice straw mixed combustion power generation process is the most environmentally friendly and resource-saving sludge disposal process, which is worth vigorously promoting.

关键词(KeyWords)： 市政污泥;混燃发电;生命周期评价;环境影响;资源消耗;碳排放
municipal sludge;co-combustion power generation;life cycle assessment;environmental impact;resource consumption;carbon emissions

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52006108)

作者(Author): 周钢,宋涛,马士伟,沈来宏,葛晖骏
ZHOU Gang,SONG Tao,MA Shiwei,SHEN Laihong,GE Huijun

DOI: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.RE22042401

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 全翠，张广涛，许毓，等.污泥热解残渣中重金属形态分布的研究进展[J].化工学报，2022,73(1):134-143.QUAN Cui,ZHANG Guangtao,XU Yu,et al.Recent advances on the speciation distribution of heavy metals in sludge pyrolysis residue[J].CIESC Journal,2022,73(1):134-143.
• [2] RAHEEM A,SIKARWAR V S,HE J,et al.Opportunities andchallenges in sustainable treatment and resource reuse of sewage sludge:A review[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,337:616-641.
• [3] SAMOLADA M C,ZABANIOTOU A A.Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration,gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece[J].Waste Management,2014,34(2):411-420.
• [4] 陈海军，严骁，许榕发，等.市政污泥掺烧对生活垃圾焚烧设施烟气中污染物排放的影响[J].安全与环境学报，2018,18(2):766-772.CHEN Haijun,YAN Xiao,XU Rongfa,et al.Gaseous pollutant emissions from the mixed combustion of the municipal solid waste incinerator with sewage sludge[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2018,18(2):766-772.
• [5] 魏玉芹，周兴求，杨海英，等.调理压榨后污泥用于制备衍生燃料及燃烧特性研究[J].广东化工，2014,41(9):50-51.WEI Yuqin,ZHOU Xingqiu,YANG Haiying,et al.Study on sludge-derived fuel prepared by conditioned and pressed sludge and its combustion characteristics[J].Guangdong Chemical Industry,2014,41(9):50-51.
• [6] NAMKUNG H,LEE Y J,PARK J H,et al.Blending effect of sewage sludge and woody biomass into coal on combustion and ash agglomeration behavior[J].Fuel,2018,225:266-276.
• [7] 张宗振，李德波，冯永新，等.1 000 MW燃煤锅炉污泥掺烧试验研究与工程应用[J].热能动力工程，2020,35(1):210-216.ZHANG Zongzhen,LI Debo,FENG Yongxin,et al.Investigation and applications of co-combustion of sludge in a 1 000 MW coal fired boiler[J].Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2020,35(1):210-216.
• [8] 孙宇，龙慎伟，马同胜，等.污泥干化混煤燃烧工艺在循环流化床锅炉应用探讨[J].应用能源技术，2020(1):30-35.SUN Yu,LONG Shenwei,MA Tongsheng,et al.Discussion on application of sludge drying and blending coal combustion process in circulating fluidized bed boiler[J].Applied Energy Technology,2020(1):30-35.
• [9] 王长波，张力小，庞明月.生命周期评价方法研究综述：兼论混合生命周期评价的发展与应用[J].自然资源学报，2015,30(7):1232-1242.WANG Changbo,ZHANG Lixiao,PANG Mingyue.A review on hybrid life cycle assessment:Development and application[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(7):1232-1242.
• [10] 袁言言，肖军，黄瑛，等.基于LCA和AHP的污泥处理技术的综合性能评价[J].环境科学与技术，2015,38(S1):263-268.YUAN Yanyan,XIAO Jun,HUANG Ying,et al.Integrated performance evaluation of disposal of sludge based on Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2015,38(S1):263-268.
• [11] 赵由才，周涛，刘大江，等.改性污泥固体燃料工程示范及生命周期评价[J].有色冶金设计与研究，2018,39(2):38-43.ZHAO Youcai,ZHOU Tao,LIU Dajiang,et al.The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the modified sludge incineration in a demanstration project[J].Nonferrous Metals Engineering & Research,2018,39(2):38-43.
• [12] 朱玲，冯相昭，孔佳雯.基于生命周期评价LCA的煤制油生产过程分析[J].洁净煤技术，2018,24(2):119-126.ZHU Ling,FENG Xiangzhao,KONG Jiawen.Analysis on production process of coal to oil with Life Cycle Assessment [J].Clean Coal Technology,2018,24(2):119-126.
• [13] 李芳.二甲醚生产及应用过程的生命周期评价及价格体系研究[D].上海：同济大学，2008:32-33.
• [14] 胡荐吉.火力发电生命周期评价[J].电力系统装备，2019,(12):12-13.HU Jianji.Life cycle assessment of thermal power generation[J].Electric Power System Equipment,2019(12):12-13.
• [15] 赵旭远，张露，冒小丹，等.堆存污泥深度脱水及其干化泥饼焚烧特性研究[J].环境科学研究，2021,34(4):1015-1022.ZHAO Xuyuan,ZHANG Lu,MAO Xiaodan,et al.Deep dewatering of stocked sludge and incineration characteristics of dehydrated sludge cake[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(4):1015-1022.
• [16] 牟长城，陶祥云，黄忠文，等.水稻品种对三江平原稻田温室气体排放的影响[J].东北林业大学学报，2011,39(11):89-92,107.MOU Changcheng,TAO Xiangyun,HUANG Zhongwen,et al.Effects of rice varieties on emission of greenhouse gases from paddy in Sanjiang Plain[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2011,39(11):89-92,107.
• [17] 瞿婷婷.生物质热解提质转化为高品位液体燃料的生命周期评价[D].南京：东南大学，2012:26-27.
• [18] 曹溢，沈辉.秸秆发电过程中原料收集的成本分析[J].电力与能源，2012,33(5):463-466.CAO Yi,SHEN Hui.A research on collection cost in the process of straw power generation[J].Power & Energy,2012,33(5):463-466.
• [19] 满贺诚，段华波，李雪迎，等.生命周期影响评价方法及本地化研究进展[J/OL].环境工程技术学报：1-12.[2022-03-25].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ & dbname=CAPJLAST & filename=HKWZ20220325000 & uniplatform=NZKPT & v=Mo21ZJl23r6ZjxwFA7KUEEQdeba0HFWXApCG5I3kBAox535895THB4SvOHZ-K2OB.MAN Hecheng,DUAN Huabo,LI Xueying,et al.Research on the method and practice of life cycle impact assessmentin China[J/OL].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology:1-12.[2022-03-25].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST & filename=HKWZ20220325000&uniplatform=NZKPT & v=Mo21ZJl23r6ZjxwFA7KUEEQdeba0HFWXApCG5I3kBAox535895THB4SvOHZ-K2OB.
• [20] 卜寿珍.生物质转化工艺的生命周期综合性能研究[D].南京：东南大学，2014:23-24.