向柏祥,熊小鹤,卢旭超,黄军,吕钊敏,谭厚章
XIANG Baixiang,XIONG Xiaohe,LU Xuchao,HUANG Jun,LYU Zhaomin,TAN Houzhang

• 1:神华国华(北京)电力研究院有限公司
• 2:西安交通大学热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室

摘要(Abstract)：

神华煤储量巨大,因其良好的着火和燃尽特性,已成为我国主要的动力用煤之一,年消耗量超过我国煤炭总消耗量的1/10。神华煤种类较多,按灰熔点可分为高灰熔点的系列如石炭煤和准格尔煤,低灰熔点的系列如神混煤,低灰熔点煤产量大,一般是电厂的主烧煤种,为防止结渣,电厂多以低熔点煤和高熔点煤按7∶3或8∶2比例进行掺配混烧。目前的研究关注神华煤的工程燃用较多,而针对不同种类神华煤的微观差异性关注较少,选取神混、石炭2种典型的神华煤,采用红外光谱技术对其原煤和煤焦的官能团分布进行了表征比较,研究发现,神混、石炭2种烟煤的官能团分布相似,均存在CC和C C、—CH_3、—CH_2等烷烃基团以及含N、含S基团;从红外吸收峰强度看,石炭煤官能团要高于神混煤。受热成焦后,神混焦的—CH_3、—CH_2以及芳香碳碳双键等官能团吸收峰强度明显高于石炭焦。神混、石炭原煤脂肪链长接近,但石炭焦脂肪链长显著增加,而神混焦脂肪链长变化并不明显。通过扫描电镜观察到神混煤存在明显的相互交替的条带状煤岩结构,高温成焦后碳的晶体结构变得有序,孔隙结构明显增加。通过热重反应器对神混、石炭2种煤焦的氧化活性进行了比较,发现神混焦的反应活性明显高于石炭焦,神混焦更易燃尽。因此,从燃烧特性比较看,选用神混作为主力燃用煤种是合适的。
Because of enormous reserves,good ignition and burnout characteristics,Shenhua coal has become a kind of important power coal used in China.The annual consumption is more thanten percent of the gross coal consumption. There are many kinds of Shenhua coal,which can be divided into high ash fusion point( e.g.,Carboniferous,Junggar coal) and low ash fusion point( e.g.,Shenhun) in terms of ash fusion temperature.The output of low ash melting point coal is large,which is generally the main coal for power plant.However,in order to prevent slagging,the high and low ash fusion coal are blended in appropriate proportions( e.g.,7 ∶ 3,8 ∶ 2).To date,the researches mainly focused on the engineering application of Shnehua coal,whereas the investigation on the microstructure difference of different Shenhua coal has rarely been reported. Thus,two typical Shenhua coals,such as Shenhun coal and Carboniferous coal,were selected to characterize and compare the functional group distribution of raw coal and coal char by infrared spectroscopy in this work.The results show that the distribution of the functional group in Shenhun coal is similar to that in Carboniferous coal.Both Shenhun and Carboniferous coal find the alkane group,including carbon-carbon double bond,carbon-carbon triple bond,methyl and methylene group,the nitrogen-containing and sufur-containing groups. In term of FTIR absorption strength,the functional groups of Carboniferous coal is higher than that of Shenhun coal.However,FTIR absorption strength measurements show that the carbon-carbon double bond,methyl and methylene group in Shenhun char is higher than that in Carboniferous char.This is probably because the fatty chain in Shenhun and Carboniferous coal are almost of the same length.The length of fatty chain of Carboniferous char increases significantly,meanwhile,that of Shenhun char shows little change.In addition,It is observed by SEM thatthere is obviously alternative banded rock-coal structure in Shenhun coal. However,the crystalline structure becomes in order,and the pore structure increases significantly after coking.The oxidation activity of Shenhun coke and Carboniferous char was compared by thermogravimetric reactor.Additionally,it is found that the reactivity of Shenhun char is obviously higher than that of Carboniferous char,and Shenhun coke is more flammable.Therefore,from the comparison of combustion characteristics,it is appropriate to choose Shenhun as the main fuel coal.

关键词(KeyWords)： 官能团分布;反应活性;红外光谱;热重
functional groups distribution;reactivity;FTIR;thermogravimetry

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFB0604203)

作者(Author): 向柏祥,熊小鹤,卢旭超,黄军,吕钊敏,谭厚章
XIANG Baixiang,XIONG Xiaohe,LU Xuchao,HUANG Jun,LYU Zhaomin,TAN Houzhang

DOI: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.20020601

参考文献(References)：

• [1]宁国睿．低热值石炭煤掺烧比例分析[J]．电力科学与工程,2008,24(10):38-40.NING Guorui.Study on mixed firing proportion about low calorific value carboniferous coal[J].Electric Power Science and Engineering,2008,24(10):38-40．
• [2]程志强,姚伟,刘家利．神华石炭-侏罗纪煤掺烧的结渣性能[J]．洁净煤技术,2007,13(5):65-67,88.CHENG Zhiqiang,YAO Wei,LIU Jiali.Study onproperty of Shenhua carbon iferous and jurassic period blending combustion[J].Clean Coal Technology,2007,13(5):65-67,88．
• [3]郭琴琴,杨震．燃用神华煤的600 MW超临界锅炉NOx排放特性的试验研究[J]．锅炉技术,2007(5):1-5,67.GUO Qinqin,YANG Zhen.Experiment research on NOxemissions characteristics of Shenhua coal combustion 600 MW supercritical boiler[J].Bioler Technology,2007(5):1-5,67．
• [4]黄军．燃用神华煤2 028 t/h亚临界锅炉超低NOx燃烧优化试验研究[J]．中国电力,2014,47(12):7-12.HUANG Jun.Experimental study on combustion optimization for ultra low NOxemissions in 2 028 t/h sub-critical boilers firing shenhua-coal[J].Electric Power,2014,47(12):7-12．
• [5]高鹏,高明,张建文,等．600 MW机组锅炉低氮燃烧器改造试验研究[J]．热力发电,2013,42(4):43-46,69.GAO Peng,Gao Ming,Zhang Jianwen,et al.Experimental study on low NOxcombustion transformation on a 600 MW unit boiler[J].Thermal Power Generation,2013,42(4):43-46,69．
• [6]张健,李兴智．百万塔式炉机组神华煤掺烧试验研究[J]．洁净煤技术,2017,23(1):65-68.ZHANG Jian,Li Xingzhi.Experimental research on Shenhua coal blending combustion in a 1 000 MW tower type boiler unit[J].Clean Coal Technology,2017,23(1):65-68．
• [7]张云红,邢秀云,智顺．黄骅港煤炭低位收到基发热量经验公式的回归和应用[J]．煤质技术,2012(4):28-30.ZHANG Yunhong,Xing Xiuyun,Zhi Shun.Discussion on the regression and the application of empirical formulation of net calorific value as received of coal in Huanghua port[J].Coal Quality Technology,2012(4):28-30．
• [8]赵居奇．350 MW直流锅炉燃用神华煤防结焦技术研究[J]．大众标准化,2019(14):102-103.ZHAO Juqi.Study on anti-coking technology of Shenhua coal burning on a 350 MW once-through boiler[J].Popular Standardization,2019(14):102-103．
• [9]蒋先明,何伟平．简明红外光谱识谱法[M]．桂林:广西师范大学出版社,1992.JIANG Xianming,HE Weiping.Concisely analyzing fourier transform infra-red spectrum[M].Guilin:Guangxi Normal University Press,1992．
• [10]闻辂．矿物红外光谱学[M]．重庆:重庆大学出版社,1989.WEN Lu.Infrared Spectroscopy of Minerals[M].Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,1989．
• [11]赵孟浩,张守玉,郑红俊,等．低阶煤中含氧官能团干燥前后的演变规律[J]．煤炭学报,2016,41(2):483-489.ZHAO Menghao,ZHANG Shouyu,ZHENG Hongjun,et al.Transition of the oxygen-containing functional groups of low rank coal during drying process[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(2):483-489．
• [12]谢克昌．煤的结构与反应性[M]．北京:科学出版社,2002.XIE Kechang.Structure and reactivity of coal[M].Beijing:Science Press,2002．
• [13]阎晓,车得福,徐通模．铜川贫煤中氮赋存形态的红外光谱研究[J]．西北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(4):55-58.YAN Xiao,CHE Defu,XU Tongmo.The identification of functional forms of nitrogen in Tongchuan lean coal by FTIR[J].Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2004,34(4):55-58．
• [14]ARORA M,PRADHAN M M.FTIR spectroscopy of coordinated water and lattice water vibrations in neodymium sulphate[J].Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics,1993,31 (6):409-411．
• [15]GAVALAS G R.Coal pyrolysis[M].New York:Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,1982．
• [16]王亚超,魏子淇,王彩萍,等．黄铁矿对煤氧化表面官能团的影响[J]．西安科技大学学报,2018,38(4):585-591.WANG Yachao,WEI Ziqi,WANG Caiping,et al.Effects of pyrite on functional groups during coal oxidation[J].Journal of Xi'an U-niversity of Science and Technology,2018,38(4):585-591．
• [17]毛念新,黄叶肖,陆卫,等．天然Fe S2(黄铁矿)的红外光谱研究[J]．物理学报,1993,42(10):1712-1718.MAO Nianxin,HUANG Yexiao,LU Wei,et al.Far-infrared spectra of naturally occurring Fe S2(Pyrite)[J].Acta Physica Sinica,1993,42(10):1712-1718．
• [18]黄涛,张胜男,黄菲,等．红透山黄铁矿的红外光谱研究[J]．地学前缘,2013,20(3):104-109.HUANG Tao,ZHANG Shengnan,HUANG Fei,et al.Infra-red spectroscopic study of Hongtoushan pyrite[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(3):104-109．
• [19]韩德馨．中国煤岩学[M]．徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1996.HAN Dexin.Chinese coal petrology[M].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology Press,1996．
• [20]焦淑静,张慧,薛东川,等．泥页岩有机显微组分的扫描电镜形貌特征及识别方法[J]．电子显微学报,2018,37 (2):137-144.JIAO Shujing,ZHANG Hui,XUE Dongchuan,et al.Morphological structure and identify method of organic macerals of shale with SEM[J].Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society,2018,37(2):137-144．
• [21]邓芙蓉．利用TG-DSC、XRD、SEM等多种手段研究煤灰的熔融特性[D]．杭州:浙江大学,2005.DENG Furong.Study on the melting characteristics of coal ash by TG-DSC,XRD,SEM and other methods[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.