窦雅玲,刘辉,程靖,李文涛,于洋
DOU Ya-ling1,LIU Hui1,CHENG Jing2,LI Wen-tao1,YU Yang1(1.State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering

• 1:北京化工大学化工资源有效利用国家重点实验室
• 2:中国化学工程集团公司科技信息部

摘要(Abstract)：

采用德尔菲法(Delphi)和层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)相结合的方法构建煤热解多联产系统评价体系分层结构模型。确定和计算各级指标权重并进行总排序的一致性检验,最终建立了技术、经济、环境、社会4个一级指标及若干个二级、三级指标构成的综合评价体系。对其各级指标权重进行排序。结果表明:一级指标中技术指标所占比重最大,依次为环境指标、经济指标、社会指标;二级指标中效率、企业收益、技术成熟度位于前列;最末端的三级指标中,工业化程度指标所占比重最大,其次是输出单位能量废水排放量,最后是企业内部收益率。
Determine the hierarchical structure model of coal pyrolysis poly-generation system with Delphi and analytic hierarchy process(AHP) methods.The index weight of each indicator in three grades and consistency check of the total sorts are implemented based on the AHP method.The evaluation system of low rank coal pyrolysis poly-generation is ultimately established which contains 4 first-level indicators,10 second-level indicators and 17 third-level indicators.The results show that,in the first-level indicators,the technical indicators are the highest,followed by the environmental,economic and social.In the second-level indicators,the order of the combination weights is determined as efficiency,enterprise income and technology maturity.In the three indicators,the subsequence of the weight is industrialization proportion,wastewater emissions and enterprise internal rate of return.

关键词(KeyWords)： 煤热解多联产;评价体系;权重;AHP
low rank coal pyrolysis poly-generation;evaluation system;weight;AHP

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)资助项目(2011CB201306)

作者(Author): 窦雅玲,刘辉,程靖,李文涛,于洋
DOU Ya-ling1,LIU Hui1,CHENG Jing2,LI Wen-tao1,YU Yang1(1.State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering

DOI: 10.13226/j.issn.1006-6772.2013.02.013

参考文献(References)：

• [1]贺永德.现代煤化工技术手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
• [2]岑可法,倪明江,骆仲泱,等.循环流化床燃气蒸汽联产工艺及装置:中国,9210050312[P].1993-07-28.
• [3]姚建中,郭慕孙.煤炭拔头提取液体燃料新工艺[J].化学进展,1995,7(3):205-208.
• [4]岑可法,骆仲泱,王勤辉,等.煤的热电气多联产技术及工程实例[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
• [5]方梦祥,骆仲泱,王勤辉,等.循环流化床热、电、气三联产装置的开发和应用前景分析[J].动力工程,1997,17(4):21-27.
• [6]王新雷.一种新的联合能源生产工艺——热、电、煤气“三联产”[J].电站系统工程,1998,14(3):3-6.
• [7]Azapagic A,Millington A,Collett A.A methodology forintegrating sustainability considerations into processdesign[J].Chemical Engineering Research&Design,2006,84(A6):439-452.
• [8]Carvalho A,Gani R,Matos H.Design of sustainablechemical processes:Systematic retrofit analysis generationand evaluation of alternatives[J].Process Safety andEnvironmental Protection,2008,86(5):328-346.
• [9]Omasa T,Kishimoto M.An attempt at decision making intissue engineering:reactor evaluation using the analytichierarchy process(AHP)[J].Biochemical EngineeringJournal,2004,20(3):173-179.
• [10]任世华,姚飞,俞珠峰.洁净煤技术评价指标体系权重确定[J].洁净煤技术,2005,11(1):9-12.
• [11]Gangadharan P,A Zanwar,K Zheng,et al.Sustainabilityassessment of polygeneration processes based on syngasderived from coal and natural gas[J].Computers andChemical Engineering,2012,39(1):105-117.
• [12]柯惠新,黄京华,沈浩.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,1996.